- 註冊時間
- 2023-5-6
- 精華
- 在線時間
- 小時
- 米币
-
- 最後登錄
- 1970-1-1
累計簽到:5 天 連續簽到:1 天
|
Sexual Precocity in a 16-Month-Old
4 F* R; v* L% B( z6 s: E4 HBoy Induced by Indirect Topical
, ?) o7 \6 W" PExposure to Testosterone. d) J5 A# V) d7 o
Samar K. Bhowmick, MD, FACE,1 Tracy Ricke, MD,2
3 J7 ~% C# h$ gand Kenneth R. Rettig, MD1 F1 S w; d9 ?2 d6 \
Clinical Pediatrics9 r. H4 A: w: Q# z# Y
Volume 46 Number 6
0 T6 g9 X. k5 ?& _# _; c+ B; R1 fJuly 2007 540-543
4 o% @( D6 f. M© 2007 Sage Publications
) r( M( `9 n& p; O5 V! v, Q10.1177/0009922806296651- m$ h9 v, u$ z; k& R8 \6 M
http://clp.sagepub.com
* m4 |/ H. w! r3 i, |2 chosted at
3 N) r% W* r9 K- e/ K, ^' D' Xhttp://online.sagepub.com
5 \( Y' X3 o$ e5 J, w a& {Precocious puberty in boys, central or peripheral,
e0 b4 f- _/ q7 J, s1 wis a significant concern for physicians. Central; v. m6 j9 x4 n! C2 Q8 {
precocious puberty (CPP), which is mediated- p% e3 w+ V3 B' j7 q7 x
through the hypothalamic pituitary gonadal axis, has
, m4 Q, a& n2 Na higher incidence of organic central nervous system P- a y0 o& L3 ^( a
lesions in boys.1,2 Virilization in boys, as manifested& o# v* {" y9 k$ ~/ E4 f' ~* Y1 J
by enlargement of the penis, development of pubic
. f; ?( @4 F7 I1 H, ~hair, and facial acne without enlargement of testi-
+ F! `5 r- w2 @ o. Qcles, suggests peripheral or pseudopuberty.1-3 We# x* l0 i# ~) E+ }
report a 16-month-old boy who presented with the0 {4 n+ P. n' Q
enlargement of the phallus and pubic hair develop-" j6 K# K4 n" L8 r4 o9 K2 z8 D4 D
ment without testicular enlargement, which was due4 O7 ]! b% ^7 u( Q
to the unintentional exposure to androgen gel used by
+ e/ E; p+ A7 j+ v3 L- Jthe father. The family initially concealed this infor-
8 h% H4 J9 @# Z; imation, resulting in an extensive work-up for this k+ N, N1 _+ c7 u* i% l8 o
child. Given the widespread and easy availability of
4 I7 q7 h( ]" Dtestosterone gel and cream, we believe this is proba-
. ^! f& j9 q2 }& P! X, X( Fbly more common than the rare case report in the. f, P; t/ m; H- A
literature.4
, |, e/ a' m S# S- O% mPatient Report
' g6 s& v4 N8 V& e8 ?: RA 16-month-old white child was referred to the
0 s# ^% T" `7 `2 iendocrine clinic by his pediatrician with the concern# ]# ?4 ?3 n, U6 O
of early sexual development. His mother noticed
$ f- i) F% T$ n& E2 @3 O8 Xlight colored pubic hair development when he was# M0 i( h8 |6 d k" O
From the 1Division of Pediatric Endocrinology, 2University of
i" r/ m: L4 j( s1 J# HSouth Alabama Medical Center, Mobile, Alabama.: p2 D5 |9 k( L, m/ f) H2 x
Address correspondence to: Samar K. Bhowmick, MD, FACE,8 H7 @7 j1 v; W5 b- O
Professor of Pediatrics, University of South Alabama, College of
4 e9 ~1 i# Z% e7 Z- F# v& EMedicine, 2451 Fillingim St. Mastin 212, Mobile, AL 36617-2297;
. z4 V% k! F$ S1 v. A8 Le-mail: [email protected].
6 P5 j' S" z6 A/ j: [% V+ A8 ^about 6 to 7 months old, which progressively became
! S( \# E3 v9 S' q8 Bdarker. She was also concerned about the enlarge-% ]. m G2 K3 \- `
ment of his penis and frequent erections. The child
N5 Q/ W8 n* S& x8 v1 [was the product of a full-term normal delivery, with5 a' e5 S) Z$ ]6 }! \& L* h
a birth weight of 7 lb 14 oz, and birth length of
2 k3 X1 U% o$ y1 s5 `20 inches. He was breast-fed throughout the first year
9 k% i, E# K3 Y" A5 J% H+ fof life and was still receiving breast milk along with
7 a* q- F, M' isolid food. He had no hospitalizations or surgery,
8 x( E0 i" V% ~5 X3 v4 m7 d3 X4 rand his psychosocial and psychomotor development& A1 H& U- f; B; w+ H1 d, t
was age appropriate.( ~' _$ r2 N4 l. M$ P
The family history was remarkable for the father,
' `/ x4 ]1 L6 g3 C3 twho was diagnosed with hypothyroidism at age 16,
! q% z: `, t* C4 ^/ ^which was treated with thyroxine. The father’s
7 {+ d& v5 i, F' {, Yheight was 6 feet, and he went through a somewhat2 G" K& P/ \+ R: {
early puberty and had stopped growing by age 14.2 `/ J8 `1 q; @. K |( U7 P7 j
The father denied taking any other medication. The
3 H7 x" F0 M) L5 mchild’s mother was in good health. Her menarche( m' w$ O) T: V- b; X) x" z4 N
was at 11 years of age, and her height was at 5 feet2 Z/ o/ @% j$ ]. C# E$ A
5 inches. There was no other family history of pre-% ?3 j$ C* k8 N- L8 \8 b
cocious sexual development in the first-degree rela-8 y+ f n5 C$ n8 i7 A: a
tives. There were no siblings.
, K% R$ }* {$ ?4 K4 ^Physical Examination: G& F+ ]! G3 T4 i% L
The physical examination revealed a very active,6 I/ C, ?5 ?. A( O5 x
playful, and healthy boy. The vital signs documented
: m# p: S/ ^7 ]- O+ I, s) W Z! ga blood pressure of 85/50 mm Hg, his length was
" F8 ?. e7 r4 k7 r90 cm (>97th percentile), and his weight was 14.4 kg' _( j' x6 G t, M4 M7 s* H
(also >97th percentile). The observed yearly growth
d) M# n7 _9 `0 ?2 zvelocity was 30 cm (12 inches). The examination of8 d2 V$ Q1 G! R/ d, S. v
the neck revealed no thyroid enlargement./ N( m: {6 N: M2 A
The genitourinary examination was remarkable for5 @' \/ O1 i& l* _
enlargement of the penis, with a stretched length of/ m& b" y2 G. G
8 cm and a width of 2 cm. The glans penis was very well
5 A# H' m3 M# Z* Xdeveloped. The pubic hair was Tanner II, mostly around) e5 d& R" i: D3 A$ f. [, ^
540
. p8 k# q6 I; s( ]: W: uat University of Manchester Library on May 25, 2015 cpj.sagepub.com Downloaded from5 x* K7 F- N5 z& V( G
the base of the phallus and was dark and curled. The
0 b7 h1 N9 x" p! j ]0 Xtesticular volume was prepubertal at 2 mL each.
+ s# z9 _8 }2 z1 x/ A$ t& \* EThe skin was moist and smooth and somewhat* z# [" Q2 R* N. n3 Q
oily. No axillary hair was noted. There were no
+ P2 D9 q, y: q$ iabnormal skin pigmentations or café-au-lait spots.+ Q' p4 w5 U- ]8 F' x+ X2 o1 R
Neurologic evaluation showed deep tendon reflex 2+
O# z. |: b9 Abilateral and symmetrical. There was no suggestion
1 Z/ r. I5 R1 g0 G, Bof papilledema.5 z8 D, Q1 Y+ a) t) g/ S7 \
Laboratory Evaluation( R' p f! }9 Q" ~
The bone age was consistent with 28 months by
; S' x7 G) L" A( \: Uusing the standard of Greulich and Pyle at a chrono-
2 I1 M9 e, |4 k7 wlogic age of 16 months (advanced).5 Chromosomal
# n& \0 n: t& s" kkaryotype was 46XY. The thyroid function test
6 y( l/ s1 V" K2 x r+ @2 C7 t5 r$ jshowed a free T4 of 1.69 ng/dL, and thyroid stimu-7 V* ?% [& I/ t4 w6 {
lating hormone level was 1.3 µIU/mL (both normal).
2 ~3 \" b/ G* `. \1 @The concentrations of serum electrolytes, blood, O- N8 E' j9 C
urea nitrogen, creatinine, and calcium all were) l0 X7 S, h# `4 I' c
within normal range for his age. The concentration
' t1 r% t4 ]6 t: ^% `+ rof serum 17-hydroxyprogesterone was 16 ng/dL& t, P( q7 {4 m
(normal, 3 to 90 ng/dL), androstenedione was 20 Y4 `+ G' g% \3 U5 Z! |* `& O9 E
ng/dL (normal, 18 to 80 ng/dL), dehydroepiandros-
8 P) Y5 M, ]0 j" X1 E7 K$ Q7 sterone was 38 ng/dL (normal, 50 to 760 ng/dL), e$ \* ?5 b: W) w$ V) h
desoxycorticosterone was 4.3 ng/dL (normal, 7 to
1 q# l; k$ l* _( i5 \. o49ng/dL), 11-desoxycortisol (specific compound S): E9 B/ a3 |" T; I" [% t% l7 o3 ?& H
was 43 ng/dL (normal, 10 to 156 ng/dL), serum cor-
8 ? ]8 l! Q4 rtisol was 7.6 µg/dL (normal, 2.8 to 23 µg/dL), total
* k0 Q! g' ?/ C, q% d/ N* Y/ N. {* Dtestosterone was 60 ng/dL (normal <3 to 10 ng/dL),+ e, j. u. ^/ O& b1 s1 l, B, X
and β-human chorionic gonadotropin was less than
, T) W6 s1 f: r: t2 `# T5 mIU/mL (normal <5 mIU/mL). Serum follicular
) p5 ]7 Y9 ]7 Xstimulating hormone and leuteinizing hormone
9 a; G) ]0 l4 B8 |. D& v( v2 ~concentrations were less than 0.05 mIU/mL
4 J' Q. w' q) |& z4 _(prepubertal).9 A1 R0 @/ y$ Y) D
The parents were notified about the laboratory* C" M! t- `9 ?
results and were informed that all of the tests were3 r; Z) J& v( F+ r( l, @
normal except the testosterone level was high. The$ P* k6 U0 v- B- E' A
follow-up visit was arranged within a few weeks to
; r( X8 |. [2 t* x: Cobtain testicular and abdominal sonograms; how-9 F( B! n4 A) ^$ A) V
ever, the family did not return for 4 months.7 |9 U) f/ {" a) i- K W3 h0 b
Physical examination at this time revealed that the. Y a8 I- s3 w3 N( F2 X
child had grown 2.5 cm in 4 months and had gained
, x) P m7 |$ w7 T; e- b% L, F& O& M2 kg of weight. Physical examination remained
0 R0 j5 j8 e: Lunchanged. Surprisingly, the pubic hair almost com-. K: f" t3 `4 o
pletely disappeared except for a few vellous hairs at; _& h5 m6 l9 ~% V; P9 g, u
the base of the phallus. Testicular volume was still 2
: {& C$ x; G4 T0 N8 q, jmL, and the size of the penis remained unchanged.
/ G% d9 `& J$ Y' i8 P" { z4 F% KThe mother also said that the boy was no longer hav-, |+ y+ d$ r/ k1 K6 \
ing frequent erections.
' _" p, @3 c( }Both parents were again questioned about use of
& @6 T8 d! Q3 c- ~any ointment/creams that they may have applied to
: a+ k& B- D* R8 o6 ]the child’s skin. This time the father admitted the
+ X U$ ]6 O; rTopical Testosterone Exposure / Bhowmick et al 5416 g6 L% x- \2 q$ d% h" I" h
use of testosterone gel twice daily that he was apply-& R G3 [$ q' q; }8 H, ?
ing over his own shoulders, chest, and back area for
1 X- }: V- a+ F) Qa year. The father also revealed he was embarrassed' e* f: Y' b4 Y/ @; _8 Z
to disclose that he was using a testosterone gel pre-
3 ^: s: u$ f" C' r7 [scribed by his family physician for decreased libido
, `" ^8 Z$ _' e" @ N+ {4 Ysecondary to depression.
# R* V4 [8 t7 u/ pThe child slept in the same bed with parents.
$ I+ t: r5 y- UThe father would hug the baby and hold him on his p! J. z' |$ `+ Q
chest for a considerable period of time, causing sig-; t& _, l! N9 k
nificant bare skin contact between baby and father.
/ P* W+ X9 f( M4 \8 h2 C4 i& NThe father also admitted that after the phone call,
$ i- C' h' h$ ^! w" C8 X; Ywhen he learned the testosterone level in the baby
6 p- |1 \" G: x- Bwas high, he then read the product information
1 ?' Q7 ^9 J' J3 w( k$ Ipacket and concluded that it was most likely the rea-
. u4 [; G# g$ eson for the child’s virilization. At that time, they
6 I7 k! n r& [, M) j3 z% ndecided to put the baby in a separate bed, and the6 ?- l+ K& o) }+ |
father was not hugging him with bare skin and had7 {; y& x" V. `4 N
been using protective clothing. A repeat testosterone
. ~$ v7 g2 D# v% \test was ordered, but the family did not go to the p" p% {' X1 K- a) w, O) s5 `- x9 H
laboratory to obtain the test.
$ k! O: O; Z. P. G; ^Discussion
! \. E2 ^/ r) p4 _; ?% FPrecocious puberty in boys is defined as secondary l5 y% h, a% ?% V& m
sexual development before 9 years of age.1,4
# ?8 X1 X/ [& yPrecocious puberty is termed as central (true) when
" Q& K0 O9 h! v9 a! T2 R$ Bit is caused by the premature activation of hypo-& |$ q* l+ {: o) z; W. R
thalamic pituitary gonadal axis. CPP is more com-+ W" v! E8 O/ {2 Y4 M* N& B# M- l
mon in girls than in boys.1,3 Most boys with CPP8 V, I3 ~% w. Y, M7 `2 Y7 E# M
may have a central nervous system lesion that is
+ k! H- v3 K2 S* |+ rresponsible for the early activation of the hypothal-: p, a! Q5 N1 p* H& j5 y6 Q ]4 e
amic pituitary gonadal axis.1-3 Thus, greater empha-! Q5 ]! V6 A" f0 G- b% r3 b
sis has been given to neuroradiologic imaging in
/ D0 T, }% ?9 tboys with precocious puberty. In addition to viril-8 j# m% q7 [8 q3 j. b+ ^. Z0 z
ization, the clinical hallmark of CPP is the symmet-
% g- C9 e$ U' Wrical testicular growth secondary to stimulation by
! q" c( ~. p$ X: N+ ], X9 {; vgonadotropins.1,3
+ Q) E: s+ N# K% E* L. V, s, gGonadotropin-independent peripheral preco- Q4 c* ]' Q: P9 U8 j/ a; E
cious puberty in boys also results from inappropriate
`7 v1 W: s/ _( V' G7 c% landrogenic stimulation from either endogenous or, A$ k$ P5 v4 f+ [2 C; I
exogenous sources, nonpituitary gonadotropin stim-
% ^, C: o: F u7 d' Dulation, and rare activating mutations.3 Virilizing7 Q8 t I4 s2 ]! y
congenital adrenal hyperplasia producing excessive
; B3 i4 j$ P+ w, o+ qadrenal androgens is a common cause of precocious+ G+ V* f5 j# }2 A; {. |! D" C
puberty in boys.3,4% n/ A1 ^# n# P" i$ }& d& g
The most common form of congenital adrenal
; _( W$ x3 m+ K& U+ ~9 `hyperplasia is the 21-hydroxylase enzyme deficiency.
4 c5 C# X7 A/ t- S. u! F0 V9 [The 11-β hydroxylase deficiency may also result in. G/ w9 L9 Q$ K& A1 ?5 l& j
excessive adrenal androgen production, and rarely,
0 m. R2 l9 o3 l4 v# Can adrenal tumor may also cause adrenal androgen5 [2 m9 B/ }9 @$ t. p& a- w- H
excess.1,3- k- f9 n1 Y y$ L
at University of Manchester Library on May 25, 2015 cpj.sagepub.com Downloaded from! j8 ?8 ?* H7 L2 U7 w# O
542 Clinical Pediatrics / Vol. 46, No. 6, July 2007- t! s" T# W5 o
A unique entity of male-limited gonadotropin-
( k! ]' Y* \" w9 V0 Y' o0 Oindependent precocious puberty, which is also known
* r2 d1 c( w: b8 B& ^5 ^# z @as testotoxicosis, may cause precocious puberty at a; V2 x, B6 U" P T% e% U* E5 E
very young age. The physical findings in these boys* |' e- u1 e, k6 {7 o. n2 `" N
with this disorder are full pubertal development,
) `$ `: F$ G5 Gincluding bilateral testicular growth, similar to boys
' b* n/ R1 M ]$ Cwith CPP. The gonadotropin levels in this disorder
+ p( \. I/ i6 V1 o% ]5 ~9 pare suppressed to prepubertal levels and do not show( l9 n, U8 |% ]7 v( v; Y' r" b9 r
pubertal response of gonadotropin after gonadotropin-6 C) t; C' P* U
releasing hormone stimulation. This is a sex-linked& l1 I5 h7 r7 P- c
autosomal dominant disorder that affects only
/ G( p$ r4 z6 {! ~% s5 Wmales; therefore, other male members of the family- @7 c6 T0 d/ X1 o
may have similar precocious puberty.31 I+ l" C C+ w. o6 W, g
In our patient, physical examination was incon-
4 T+ m' A7 O5 @5 x2 W4 i6 Csistent with true precocious puberty since his testi-
) ?! _' r$ j- v' Pcles were prepubertal in size. However, testotoxicosis4 r" O7 K \4 E5 N+ f
was in the differential diagnosis because his father
) c0 r o8 E @started puberty somewhat early, and occasionally,# Z2 f; D# l1 k( C1 V, A5 B
testicular enlargement is not that evident in the
4 A. w# K3 a" z( ^1 Cbeginning of this process.1 In the absence of a neg-% E% B5 D+ \7 q9 Y( t. Z* Z! C0 [+ V {! p
ative initial history of androgen exposure, our5 s, s* B0 _0 _; C; c# n* D
biggest concern was virilizing adrenal hyperplasia,) ?' [+ O$ g, m9 K1 `% K! q
either 21-hydroxylase deficiency or 11-β hydroxylase2 D9 m" [4 \$ J/ i4 x- r5 q
deficiency. Those diagnoses were excluded by find-
; _& l: L, a3 a: k$ u7 ]3 v6 fing the normal level of adrenal steroids.$ y. A- u/ B) I5 Z7 F! q9 A' ]# D
The diagnosis of exogenous androgens was strongly
) R) L9 [, E. U* F+ z8 @ o4 esuspected in a follow-up visit after 4 months because/ R7 y% I" O) ~2 K# I" m
the physical examination revealed the complete disap-
8 S: E. _% W& M% m6 U. o8 J5 ?pearance of pubic hair, normal growth velocity, and& `1 L# J/ a c& L0 j/ v6 g$ m3 y1 e
decreased erections. The father admitted using a testos-+ _+ s( S( m% R" T- _) _& F4 \
terone gel, which he concealed at first visit. He was& N3 I/ `# x3 V8 L* b% q
using it rather frequently, twice a day. The Physicians’3 I ^, p/ a9 B: L. B- d
Desk Reference, or package insert of this product, gel or, ~3 |6 A5 O* ]+ i, z
cream, cautions about dermal testosterone transfer to3 P/ w% J% \1 V! S
unprotected females through direct skin exposure.' W5 A# v3 C) \" W# @) H( a
Serum testosterone level was found to be 2 times the* P$ a0 A' h2 `% s: \( G8 M
baseline value in those females who were exposed to; f# v9 ?5 V& y6 `. m
even 15 minutes of direct skin contact with their male- c8 [ u& m# S% x2 ^, Q
partners.6 However, when a shirt covered the applica-* ]. \( X: B8 L3 B( o
tion site, this testosterone transfer was prevented.
7 T$ l: P! I, K" O1 Z9 _" XOur patient’s testosterone level was 60 ng/mL,
) u$ T7 Y C3 C4 ywhich was clearly high. Some studies suggest that
: _) v5 h2 l# r' W; C5 `* pdermal conversion of testosterone to dihydrotestos-( y7 O; _, G' Q8 J# Y' T" [9 g
terone, which is a more potent metabolite, is more7 W& O( w, i! ^1 P
active in young children exposed to testosterone
. L' K @# a: O# gexogenously7; however, we did not measure a dihy-
+ g' {; Y. c3 {3 m2 Bdrotestosterone level in our patient. In addition to2 y6 z! N; J2 [/ N: M2 A
virilization, exposure to exogenous testosterone in, `! M9 K; r6 X" \: H
children results in an increase in growth velocity and
3 P- q9 {- W* G! yadvanced bone age, as seen in our patient.
! m& ~8 B+ d) Z1 aThe long-term effect of androgen exposure during
) C4 r8 V$ ?2 I0 ]; hearly childhood on pubertal development and final& |" M% F5 u! C# x! p4 u. l
adult height are not fully known and always remain
" q" m3 O! y3 i2 F0 c5 O* }) La concern. Children treated with short-term testos-
& V# E0 H/ ]$ q- `8 zterone injection or topical androgen may exhibit some
7 v" B2 _" k5 E% n% ]acceleration of the skeletal maturation; however, after
3 a7 g3 {$ A+ D/ B/ |cessation of treatment, the rate of bone maturation& X) d' o! K% j, R( s$ `% b
decelerates and gradually returns to normal.8,96 Q7 z+ O+ h1 w, `* b" P, m
There are conflicting reports and controversy# ^3 {5 q6 f! X& r, v
over the effect of early androgen exposure on adult0 Q/ G: n$ P* @
penile length.10,11 Some reports suggest subnormal
# @, e* F+ \7 _+ p4 Qadult penile length, apparently because of downreg-7 K% Q; l: Y" L& `+ Q+ y' t# z
ulation of androgen receptor number.10,12 However,1 I2 i7 e& f& J; Z2 t. T
Sutherland et al13 did not find a correlation between$ ^0 `& x% _9 n, ?. ~5 b9 } I i
childhood testosterone exposure and reduced adult# Q3 B# h6 f1 H
penile length in clinical studies.4 s, q: j2 [9 [; B' a; U( @% ~
Nonetheless, we do not believe our patient is3 W, F, f" o# c4 J1 @3 _$ [8 f/ T
going to experience any of the untoward effects from
* g# i6 T# K2 o* m% stestosterone exposure as mentioned earlier because& \$ p+ j; u! `/ K: ^
the exposure was not for a prolonged period of time.
8 S, j1 X$ I) K& A0 A" O6 MAlthough the bone age was advanced at the time of
0 Y/ e+ _* l" H7 ]9 ~3 Udiagnosis, the child had a normal growth velocity at( J+ n0 ?! u/ l+ s: d8 D9 r+ H
the follow-up visit. It is hoped that his final adult
" z: A- `7 r; {, a0 `+ d( j! {height will not be affected.! s2 |8 y4 ]8 F2 j7 A# k
Although rarely reported, the widespread avail-6 k. E/ [& {8 c( i$ k( f, P; U
ability of androgen products in our society may+ B! f8 \1 g; r
indeed cause more virilization in male or female" E2 _( Y J! G& v; t7 R
children than one would realize. Exposure to andro-# D7 d; F1 q" S6 V/ U" ?/ q
gen products must be considered and specific ques- h9 I% D& @( U8 ~% {+ e
tioning about the use of a testosterone product or, t8 h, \4 I+ a6 c
gel should be asked of the family members during
1 H" k: b& l+ K) Nthe evaluation of any children who present with vir-
, v3 K5 W: [5 J" i2 o: Y! i3 X. ailization or peripheral precocious puberty. The diag-
$ y1 Q% O: G8 y6 Z) `; i; b# y5 Vnosis can be established by just a few tests and by; D5 C1 ^. t. }4 o' Y
appropriate history. The inability to obtain such a
+ p- S* o# R& I3 E& U- ]9 u. xhistory, or failure to ask the specific questions, may/ a. n. T. d' A1 n3 j6 b' o
result in extensive, unnecessary, and expensive( l1 t& Q5 i& x3 D
investigation. The primary care physician should be
/ _! c* M8 M0 B- W/ I' Uaware of this fact, because most of these children
2 p- E" P% G6 P* J5 ?may initially present in their practice. The Physicians’
& @, O7 f& W& i3 xDesk Reference and package insert should also put a
9 p) T8 q" F0 M( x4 H3 ?9 |warning about the virilizing effect on a male or
& P; C) Y% B P5 ifemale child who might come in contact with some-) t# |( l1 ^9 N7 O
one using any of these products.
& p( P$ L5 F# q1 q7 W! [8 MReferences
: _1 y' B/ O g5 \1. Styne DM. The testes: disorder of sexual differentiation
: ^2 Q' |6 ?- u4 rand puberty in the male. In: Sperling MA, ed. Pediatric
9 v8 q- S- ?7 }4 |; l$ C( I4 xEndocrinology. 2nd ed. Philadelphia, PA: WB Saunders;
$ _3 c" W8 `- S8 }- {3 I. y2002: 565-628.
7 i& m! H* ]3 w: H: M* {4 B2. Rivarola M, Belgorosky A, Mendilaharzu H, et al. Precocious
% f( G" I! K, q0 G+ A M) T: Lpuberty in children with tumours of the suprasellar pineal |
|