- 註冊時間
- 2023-5-6
- 精華
- 在線時間
- 小時
- 米币
-
- 最後登錄
- 1970-1-1
累計簽到:5 天 連續簽到:1 天
|
Sexual Precocity in a 16-Month-Old, h3 i0 M8 M* S" n1 s$ i, B
Boy Induced by Indirect Topical% [; Y% b8 M' P% x( [
Exposure to Testosterone3 S: A) k' D& x0 X5 j" |
Samar K. Bhowmick, MD, FACE,1 Tracy Ricke, MD,2
1 W L. v1 B3 r3 @3 r4 m2 fand Kenneth R. Rettig, MD16 p0 r) f% Y& ]+ A
Clinical Pediatrics
% h$ P- x& Q& Z- Y" H5 oVolume 46 Number 6
7 \+ r8 Z" l! i' m8 w7 ZJuly 2007 540-5434 f" M6 o: F* i, j1 G/ R
© 2007 Sage Publications. x$ m2 z( y* _2 r
10.1177/0009922806296651( t7 k4 Y) P8 y8 b& J% O
http://clp.sagepub.com, @7 n# D6 }6 V& V
hosted at: j# T6 z" Q; T( b& g$ R
http://online.sagepub.com
2 V7 C, t. `+ _, ? s5 v2 gPrecocious puberty in boys, central or peripheral,/ R2 W1 |& a' g$ n7 z
is a significant concern for physicians. Central4 P' v9 S1 W O, t$ |2 w
precocious puberty (CPP), which is mediated
- n8 m! |' K' L0 `9 {through the hypothalamic pituitary gonadal axis, has5 ^" ]6 ?: l6 o4 n& R* H" h
a higher incidence of organic central nervous system
+ y6 S) [; x" P! y* C0 rlesions in boys.1,2 Virilization in boys, as manifested. J& N5 V0 g* }8 s
by enlargement of the penis, development of pubic
b2 T3 }( P3 x+ Nhair, and facial acne without enlargement of testi-
2 f' e$ v+ L5 L% ~5 ?9 Gcles, suggests peripheral or pseudopuberty.1-3 We' U5 l: v% h/ H+ r
report a 16-month-old boy who presented with the9 z3 r5 T8 l& R- k% ?9 m8 Y' ]
enlargement of the phallus and pubic hair develop-. ~' o# [9 K. o# {1 _
ment without testicular enlargement, which was due
7 ^. Z, \, w: a) T9 L e* [& k0 fto the unintentional exposure to androgen gel used by
# N8 a* M% w& `the father. The family initially concealed this infor-5 q+ U0 O* w$ y7 }3 v% ~8 m# {8 V
mation, resulting in an extensive work-up for this
7 W$ R4 r# g* ?, N! Y5 @4 ^( w+ nchild. Given the widespread and easy availability of
4 N3 c$ U% }2 e8 G( r8 B$ z; Htestosterone gel and cream, we believe this is proba-% k: ?; @4 U( r9 b7 l" s, r
bly more common than the rare case report in the
; | S) p3 p' kliterature.4
- C0 Q! a0 D+ ~2 W$ W9 H4 }: jPatient Report8 `8 ?3 v U; V( f7 h
A 16-month-old white child was referred to the
- _2 C* A M k- _! y: Q& q! Pendocrine clinic by his pediatrician with the concern
% |% A: F$ q1 F5 z2 X Jof early sexual development. His mother noticed
( f2 A' ~; t' V) c3 P% V" [* Blight colored pubic hair development when he was" G! m0 Y$ m/ r& g, r6 e& D% p4 u5 S
From the 1Division of Pediatric Endocrinology, 2University of
3 P; u( O2 u6 ~/ ?$ ]5 r. X; gSouth Alabama Medical Center, Mobile, Alabama.
6 o3 X' s$ r# i3 X8 f) p/ CAddress correspondence to: Samar K. Bhowmick, MD, FACE,- J2 c9 w- P# R! Q- F7 `4 L5 T2 o
Professor of Pediatrics, University of South Alabama, College of
1 D: |7 N$ O8 b% s4 ~6 C9 |' jMedicine, 2451 Fillingim St. Mastin 212, Mobile, AL 36617-2297;
- j8 K/ A8 P6 K# |$ J9 ?e-mail: [email protected].
b' u# H: r+ m& |! ?+ s( Aabout 6 to 7 months old, which progressively became
; x6 z% N' j4 Z) N& u& Mdarker. She was also concerned about the enlarge- G; G3 k4 \* C
ment of his penis and frequent erections. The child% Z, f+ e$ O& p, B) w) B8 k
was the product of a full-term normal delivery, with
6 l% |$ S4 `/ A% qa birth weight of 7 lb 14 oz, and birth length of
0 T6 B, w# Q& d& K6 t; F: {20 inches. He was breast-fed throughout the first year, c7 ^( x) q- @. c8 ?* I+ T. g9 M
of life and was still receiving breast milk along with5 X# T3 b7 F. d" O( f C, C7 W
solid food. He had no hospitalizations or surgery,% x; T I$ z- w9 |
and his psychosocial and psychomotor development
" |4 c! U2 |' b9 e1 o: s* F& Rwas age appropriate.
) n L+ f" P+ Y+ ~# |/ q+ a' \The family history was remarkable for the father,% k) \% G- G) H( K- T, L
who was diagnosed with hypothyroidism at age 16,# B/ G) U* H( U- w
which was treated with thyroxine. The father’s
& c' i9 P2 W9 a# J, T( V2 sheight was 6 feet, and he went through a somewhat! b7 D# T0 y. y- M8 g1 {
early puberty and had stopped growing by age 14.
( V7 l9 `7 C* i* |The father denied taking any other medication. The
! u+ n. a }, _child’s mother was in good health. Her menarche0 R p3 Y4 U# D4 ?1 v
was at 11 years of age, and her height was at 5 feet
4 ], ^2 o" x2 i5 inches. There was no other family history of pre-& ?1 j' S& A2 s$ \3 D) p
cocious sexual development in the first-degree rela-
' ?, ~! g. ]4 G3 Y) C# d8 w @tives. There were no siblings.
+ t# \8 U0 \8 @; n. hPhysical Examination3 h5 V2 y% Z7 f7 |1 J8 J
The physical examination revealed a very active,3 o2 ^ V1 w* h3 Y. w" q7 q& T- h
playful, and healthy boy. The vital signs documented |9 _9 L$ N9 A
a blood pressure of 85/50 mm Hg, his length was0 ]- W9 e7 P. j( p5 D( F
90 cm (>97th percentile), and his weight was 14.4 kg+ q( ^. R# U i7 R
(also >97th percentile). The observed yearly growth" }, _3 w- r* r; [4 y3 y& n( G0 J
velocity was 30 cm (12 inches). The examination of9 ^3 p1 U% b+ N3 b7 ~
the neck revealed no thyroid enlargement.0 V8 W. h$ s2 R7 ]2 n
The genitourinary examination was remarkable for
& l9 S. R' ~( f% {2 benlargement of the penis, with a stretched length of- z. b% g0 X' x( b3 T
8 cm and a width of 2 cm. The glans penis was very well
$ S3 y- @5 H6 c! k- Y- mdeveloped. The pubic hair was Tanner II, mostly around
, H! \$ g! W ^, h+ L540
2 A: E! ~ X' _+ gat University of Manchester Library on May 25, 2015 cpj.sagepub.com Downloaded from# U5 A+ |# _# R, D1 d
the base of the phallus and was dark and curled. The
- x# |" w0 w/ ctesticular volume was prepubertal at 2 mL each.
( y' y/ R- B$ k& K4 r; Y' |% ?$ VThe skin was moist and smooth and somewhat
/ J; I* S2 j* ^" H, goily. No axillary hair was noted. There were no8 K& P. C3 ?0 p# K
abnormal skin pigmentations or café-au-lait spots.; ^; q1 q+ ]: [" x4 B
Neurologic evaluation showed deep tendon reflex 2+
3 T) m/ K' m$ A3 I# xbilateral and symmetrical. There was no suggestion
/ E6 b Z9 V" Q6 N. K7 J7 y- Cof papilledema.
8 H+ V: i$ t$ ~+ ~6 NLaboratory Evaluation
- ~/ y4 p$ r- `The bone age was consistent with 28 months by
0 p1 A( H" f& G$ M8 cusing the standard of Greulich and Pyle at a chrono-
9 X# ~/ ~% S; E* k, ~logic age of 16 months (advanced).5 Chromosomal# ~9 M; P) @- g& F6 p" s
karyotype was 46XY. The thyroid function test! r( R2 K/ r2 w0 ~
showed a free T4 of 1.69 ng/dL, and thyroid stimu-
8 a. T; [( p' ^5 S; Flating hormone level was 1.3 µIU/mL (both normal).
8 a' M' Q( H! _% u2 Q5 e) VThe concentrations of serum electrolytes, blood- B. P" Z4 T6 `; {9 T+ |
urea nitrogen, creatinine, and calcium all were4 V7 b6 f- R: g6 ?- _& }0 T
within normal range for his age. The concentration
2 N& v# y, v' v, J c* Z9 Cof serum 17-hydroxyprogesterone was 16 ng/dL4 u" n* C+ w. L+ w3 \: Z5 @
(normal, 3 to 90 ng/dL), androstenedione was 20* V5 d8 h/ P7 G. A" j. r
ng/dL (normal, 18 to 80 ng/dL), dehydroepiandros-
( j" k" z" m9 M3 K% Y. S. iterone was 38 ng/dL (normal, 50 to 760 ng/dL),! e2 T; k) L& M/ D
desoxycorticosterone was 4.3 ng/dL (normal, 7 to
& J8 v+ l7 \$ x3 D! G49ng/dL), 11-desoxycortisol (specific compound S)3 W4 I$ l; a" r9 T5 h% T
was 43 ng/dL (normal, 10 to 156 ng/dL), serum cor-+ i; g4 g% {: g x
tisol was 7.6 µg/dL (normal, 2.8 to 23 µg/dL), total2 w2 e* k; W% y# _" h o( B# P
testosterone was 60 ng/dL (normal <3 to 10 ng/dL),
; U2 F" N; V& j* u5 jand β-human chorionic gonadotropin was less than# o1 g6 y. y9 B T8 j" m5 K
5 mIU/mL (normal <5 mIU/mL). Serum follicular, L9 H, j4 H/ A, U2 ~
stimulating hormone and leuteinizing hormone$ C( _; a8 ]" j; r
concentrations were less than 0.05 mIU/mL
- c8 n" Z+ z _(prepubertal).
1 X7 ?( }& [5 V! A: hThe parents were notified about the laboratory
4 H3 ^( i* n7 R8 `& c: G* `results and were informed that all of the tests were
7 l% h. u; \4 wnormal except the testosterone level was high. The
+ W1 C; m% l+ @follow-up visit was arranged within a few weeks to, m% p8 k* d) v5 \3 Z' C* k/ T
obtain testicular and abdominal sonograms; how-+ K% m9 ~. ^7 f' \( e
ever, the family did not return for 4 months.# G$ }$ k7 ?5 k: O' x
Physical examination at this time revealed that the- R& `" v4 n, [+ ^3 u
child had grown 2.5 cm in 4 months and had gained
+ X* n) q" b; I9 l+ n" s* W$ ]8 M2 kg of weight. Physical examination remained1 ~, [. k- r' w+ f3 c
unchanged. Surprisingly, the pubic hair almost com-) D& o* _, g- g1 _! j1 E, D5 i
pletely disappeared except for a few vellous hairs at2 x$ u; e! a4 s' H d' Q
the base of the phallus. Testicular volume was still 2
+ z, g9 R- O* Z! N. ]/ q9 |9 ~mL, and the size of the penis remained unchanged.+ T1 l3 [8 B8 h6 q" ?; c
The mother also said that the boy was no longer hav-
) B; d; E [) s' m6 [ing frequent erections.
, w [) z* z. x2 ABoth parents were again questioned about use of( ^& c. Q3 `, Y: ~# A1 x/ ^
any ointment/creams that they may have applied to9 j" y; D# X B- a
the child’s skin. This time the father admitted the" E$ O5 F. Y7 E3 q: T
Topical Testosterone Exposure / Bhowmick et al 541
. Z1 \7 }2 P! _4 C5 tuse of testosterone gel twice daily that he was apply-9 q. q# W$ L5 k5 c; ^
ing over his own shoulders, chest, and back area for
' g, b0 ^2 _! P9 _( Aa year. The father also revealed he was embarrassed1 l. [( w+ X/ D1 k) n
to disclose that he was using a testosterone gel pre-
) [: i$ O* N4 k" v( l. @/ k/ f' A+ m& cscribed by his family physician for decreased libido
* y4 @5 k' _$ {6 E( asecondary to depression.
' T) x+ U; }( k |5 \' N, p" y7 VThe child slept in the same bed with parents.
( L8 ]. O+ t" `6 f Z6 J: SThe father would hug the baby and hold him on his
+ r" }$ b2 O: Q4 c6 U( i) m: Jchest for a considerable period of time, causing sig-; O* @$ ~' x0 T# V, v, N& j
nificant bare skin contact between baby and father.
T4 N* z& v& N# J; T. UThe father also admitted that after the phone call, o1 X3 Z0 F, U8 w* I
when he learned the testosterone level in the baby6 b {% {# F0 b7 [
was high, he then read the product information- S2 @6 m' w2 o& F1 y9 o" H
packet and concluded that it was most likely the rea-
, `! a, I0 |' A6 m2 k2 sson for the child’s virilization. At that time, they) b0 L/ Y4 s/ E- c! k; ?0 j
decided to put the baby in a separate bed, and the" ^" ?; L# J+ b- g1 W
father was not hugging him with bare skin and had
4 m0 x; f6 S( `) cbeen using protective clothing. A repeat testosterone0 N* A9 g, D1 v; m
test was ordered, but the family did not go to the
; X0 n. v, x9 m" t- jlaboratory to obtain the test. q! l" l5 A X. ~2 e/ S9 r6 X
Discussion
0 G8 c& D q7 A0 q6 c4 L" aPrecocious puberty in boys is defined as secondary
2 b3 |" o0 E* s$ R$ I8 W0 Asexual development before 9 years of age.1,4; ^3 |5 e; H6 }2 ]- q, n
Precocious puberty is termed as central (true) when
. X) w8 ~- u- \7 s2 kit is caused by the premature activation of hypo-
/ E4 }, U0 U( ^thalamic pituitary gonadal axis. CPP is more com-1 k6 _7 X# ?, J. @( v
mon in girls than in boys.1,3 Most boys with CPP% [7 V$ h1 B4 B% r/ N3 T
may have a central nervous system lesion that is
3 I2 o- J2 X, i: \; nresponsible for the early activation of the hypothal-
1 r5 I( F( g+ xamic pituitary gonadal axis.1-3 Thus, greater empha-
D/ Q% H& [- {" ?9 isis has been given to neuroradiologic imaging in9 J4 w& ~! H, M7 M! Q
boys with precocious puberty. In addition to viril-
! ~" t; s2 n7 U) A/ Iization, the clinical hallmark of CPP is the symmet-
& L- ?: u, o; a, |1 arical testicular growth secondary to stimulation by
! R5 F% v( t6 I3 r Fgonadotropins.1,35 y, t3 p' l9 ?
Gonadotropin-independent peripheral preco-% W8 F; ~" s( z
cious puberty in boys also results from inappropriate
& i. @( I9 J9 i% ~6 y' x0 ^androgenic stimulation from either endogenous or7 ]8 d2 V h$ d% C0 X
exogenous sources, nonpituitary gonadotropin stim-
6 |" z& o3 F, H- Rulation, and rare activating mutations.3 Virilizing
7 K" n% A3 P& s) E0 zcongenital adrenal hyperplasia producing excessive% g; I6 v, l* F: P0 ^0 l
adrenal androgens is a common cause of precocious ^9 G6 X1 h" Y" L$ N9 I
puberty in boys.3,43 {# L+ X+ ]0 k1 D) T" r& {
The most common form of congenital adrenal
, [2 r6 w2 p/ ahyperplasia is the 21-hydroxylase enzyme deficiency.$ L8 m' t& }6 h8 j; r4 H; z0 I9 U- o Q
The 11-β hydroxylase deficiency may also result in
/ {- ~1 g5 L0 U9 F9 E' {# Pexcessive adrenal androgen production, and rarely,
: g" x9 j8 j' g1 T/ f: Pan adrenal tumor may also cause adrenal androgen
0 k+ { q/ _ U7 |8 h) Texcess.1,3
0 A' K( ^- w" e/ X) {# x/ R0 _at University of Manchester Library on May 25, 2015 cpj.sagepub.com Downloaded from0 d. r$ Y( N: Y, M$ w/ `1 i
542 Clinical Pediatrics / Vol. 46, No. 6, July 2007% I4 w t I9 e0 l% ~% o5 ?
A unique entity of male-limited gonadotropin-* n# R) G5 Q8 I7 p4 D$ O
independent precocious puberty, which is also known9 ~9 \1 T# ]- e6 P# ^+ Z1 h
as testotoxicosis, may cause precocious puberty at a) j& |6 U& l6 g5 \$ }$ s
very young age. The physical findings in these boys
$ V* T5 ~: \! W' V9 Y( Vwith this disorder are full pubertal development,7 E" R6 R6 _7 }. P6 v% l
including bilateral testicular growth, similar to boys+ l, e5 c+ c1 f6 V- ?7 k E
with CPP. The gonadotropin levels in this disorder
8 V1 F/ ~ B+ o6 Mare suppressed to prepubertal levels and do not show! o7 b: e* E- o5 V% X$ Y3 ]8 T
pubertal response of gonadotropin after gonadotropin-# X- R. l+ }! K" j, H
releasing hormone stimulation. This is a sex-linked
) P! s, x/ J; X+ Fautosomal dominant disorder that affects only
) |, S- R- s0 n7 i/ Emales; therefore, other male members of the family) Y D5 ?6 U- f4 }$ e! [+ }; B; v
may have similar precocious puberty.3
: `; q) `) `# y2 v; S9 j, |* VIn our patient, physical examination was incon-
: w Y! D$ ^& B$ }2 Q' i: Esistent with true precocious puberty since his testi-
) G/ a2 l& y' k Vcles were prepubertal in size. However, testotoxicosis7 R! t% E: v6 H( h3 _
was in the differential diagnosis because his father
0 ]/ G7 T) |. ^) S& w m( lstarted puberty somewhat early, and occasionally,6 C( P% Z: k$ d* q: A, _; F- |! U4 _
testicular enlargement is not that evident in the
) q. ~6 a9 z6 ^' g4 b) Fbeginning of this process.1 In the absence of a neg-
9 k% _& _5 r! D0 p1 x7 W% Oative initial history of androgen exposure, our
4 {# H/ B4 j/ G: ibiggest concern was virilizing adrenal hyperplasia,4 C4 [- s$ @0 ~) e" O7 c! I
either 21-hydroxylase deficiency or 11-β hydroxylase ?( t5 R/ `) r2 ?! A# a; {
deficiency. Those diagnoses were excluded by find-
8 i; U) q( ^: ~$ Ting the normal level of adrenal steroids.5 W! c6 U: p3 h' m% p; |# p
The diagnosis of exogenous androgens was strongly
- U8 C& h: w+ [1 a& @suspected in a follow-up visit after 4 months because
) c# j t% G$ X+ h" Ethe physical examination revealed the complete disap-
# F$ I! i) ]# a( k, M) c3 f& L [pearance of pubic hair, normal growth velocity, and4 `3 q9 D+ [9 H
decreased erections. The father admitted using a testos-& a& {8 Y( m5 ~( h; h! Z$ u
terone gel, which he concealed at first visit. He was
+ ?* a$ }6 \* n( y( `- d1 [using it rather frequently, twice a day. The Physicians’
) `$ U: T1 M) U0 i, I% YDesk Reference, or package insert of this product, gel or8 A* H P' W2 S1 @
cream, cautions about dermal testosterone transfer to
, c9 l( o% R' G h# M: r4 dunprotected females through direct skin exposure. j, W ?3 A# @( Q# T4 T: y0 k) R6 s
Serum testosterone level was found to be 2 times the
( E5 E! `' E) w% Q$ ^7 D8 _4 fbaseline value in those females who were exposed to8 R* s& f; a* t
even 15 minutes of direct skin contact with their male$ V! W& z( b$ h9 B$ j: r1 ^& q
partners.6 However, when a shirt covered the applica-. M' T& `2 ]4 I) V
tion site, this testosterone transfer was prevented.
7 q2 I/ I! v# J( ~7 T5 rOur patient’s testosterone level was 60 ng/mL,+ Y/ u) a ?, y4 {
which was clearly high. Some studies suggest that' _, k9 m( c; m/ ^1 [2 Y
dermal conversion of testosterone to dihydrotestos-& [) j# N) W! |- M. d3 Y
terone, which is a more potent metabolite, is more1 K7 S @; z8 e% D: P
active in young children exposed to testosterone
& t- i3 n5 g* s& c8 B; V( @: i9 [ ]exogenously7; however, we did not measure a dihy-9 T1 D& Q% |, o8 g: A s" }
drotestosterone level in our patient. In addition to* `2 N0 m5 _6 M' M
virilization, exposure to exogenous testosterone in2 }# ?, ?! q* X4 `% w6 N: @
children results in an increase in growth velocity and
5 B* l& }, m7 d8 jadvanced bone age, as seen in our patient.
% u" H/ W$ m( ?8 yThe long-term effect of androgen exposure during
, C2 t7 |! l8 }early childhood on pubertal development and final
: v3 m7 z1 \+ Z2 ?/ W- D1 z! Badult height are not fully known and always remain2 P& h H9 U; H5 Z& m7 \
a concern. Children treated with short-term testos-' F, z0 e- t( g/ I: ^0 |2 Z
terone injection or topical androgen may exhibit some
4 i- o! L9 n/ p2 B0 Oacceleration of the skeletal maturation; however, after
" o O, t# `7 E1 @# I0 X' Ecessation of treatment, the rate of bone maturation
: n5 Z, B3 _+ m$ t! wdecelerates and gradually returns to normal.8,9% \) e- V' `7 H
There are conflicting reports and controversy: I" D7 `2 m+ e, O
over the effect of early androgen exposure on adult
' J" O+ y0 `$ [4 y" u7 W# Mpenile length.10,11 Some reports suggest subnormal( @ _6 J" O3 d: v; T( C9 [5 o
adult penile length, apparently because of downreg-/ I& E% S( ]& J7 e1 W5 F( E
ulation of androgen receptor number.10,12 However,
; x$ B0 u3 g' U3 e' _Sutherland et al13 did not find a correlation between* @! k, l+ y v6 O6 `+ h2 ~3 U9 G
childhood testosterone exposure and reduced adult
e9 ]+ ^9 ]1 rpenile length in clinical studies.5 X+ U" i' J, T: o- s R: W. p
Nonetheless, we do not believe our patient is& d, i! y; \3 T$ L8 O0 z" O
going to experience any of the untoward effects from
8 {% M- F: f! ^0 N! O. itestosterone exposure as mentioned earlier because4 e/ A; T2 `* `5 I' Y
the exposure was not for a prolonged period of time.+ g( b* u, e6 ^5 h/ |5 |
Although the bone age was advanced at the time of
& Z- u; t, G# d+ v; Fdiagnosis, the child had a normal growth velocity at
4 L7 D6 f& i; @% T" qthe follow-up visit. It is hoped that his final adult* ~4 T% u1 ^5 s; t
height will not be affected.
) F6 g5 L( ]1 J7 f: R4 m; D$ x8 ?" YAlthough rarely reported, the widespread avail-
4 I4 X$ \+ }; L( A B9 x% G# D0 Bability of androgen products in our society may
& R6 n' k7 J& xindeed cause more virilization in male or female* E) y6 i. e5 |4 C' v I6 I1 k( F7 I
children than one would realize. Exposure to andro-
& [& [6 }0 k2 h/ C+ Q$ Qgen products must be considered and specific ques-/ a) ~' f8 }3 M3 p
tioning about the use of a testosterone product or; O( O/ G4 P. Z0 _
gel should be asked of the family members during) f' M, l$ B: k0 _
the evaluation of any children who present with vir-) H2 @4 I& E" h M8 K
ilization or peripheral precocious puberty. The diag-
8 Q1 J7 t. r& ~+ d9 B( O) xnosis can be established by just a few tests and by
- v. g& {/ l# j6 I/ a/ T6 J* Yappropriate history. The inability to obtain such a
( Z# `1 u" z- p% g2 k2 A" J5 y+ Thistory, or failure to ask the specific questions, may
2 X$ S Q/ C0 B2 zresult in extensive, unnecessary, and expensive
5 l; r4 \5 o7 s; B l. oinvestigation. The primary care physician should be4 o; x8 f* `" ]2 S+ E- a% m6 e9 e
aware of this fact, because most of these children
7 I$ c/ n# Z+ i/ K( smay initially present in their practice. The Physicians’
. X3 l. r0 T! x1 BDesk Reference and package insert should also put a
& X' {8 [8 m: [; K0 vwarning about the virilizing effect on a male or% {5 B/ S; j1 H: _+ x
female child who might come in contact with some-
. T6 C0 v q; K3 pone using any of these products.
' h* u* Q* `6 H+ Y& tReferences
/ d" W3 L/ m n7 Q6 Z1. Styne DM. The testes: disorder of sexual differentiation5 }5 p" A5 y* k! i5 a& r6 s v1 B( H
and puberty in the male. In: Sperling MA, ed. Pediatric$ ?! E* M$ [! H5 D$ t8 T
Endocrinology. 2nd ed. Philadelphia, PA: WB Saunders;( l% J7 e1 ^/ @$ k& h/ D! t5 M
2002: 565-628.. ~+ Q, O: P T( ?; X# K8 L) L, ]
2. Rivarola M, Belgorosky A, Mendilaharzu H, et al. Precocious- N: L& a% d! F7 ?6 C" ^" z
puberty in children with tumours of the suprasellar pineal |
|